The Struggle for Influence in the South China Sea: Regional Geopolitical Competition
Keywords:
South China Sea, Geopolitics, Region, China, ASEAN, United StatesAbstract
The South China Sea, as one of the main trade routes and a maritime region rich in natural resources, has become the main stage for countries in the Asia Pacific region to compete for political, economic and military influence. This research discusses the phenomenon of power struggles that occur in the South China Sea, the main focus is on geopolitical competition in this strategic region. This research uses a qualitative approach with descriptive methods. The research results show that competition in the South China Sea involves a complexity of geopolitical, geoeconomic and national interest factors. This region, rich in natural resources, especially oil and gas, is a source of tension between coastal states and external actors. China, as the dominant power in the region, shows high interest in the Nine-Dash Line territorial claims, raising concerns from ASEAN countries and the United States. The complexity of national identities and competition for natural resources creates power imbalances and conflict in the South China Sea. Solutions to overcome these challenges require multilateral cooperation and diplomacy involving all relevant parties, with the aim of achieving peace, security and balance of interests in the region.
References
Bai, J., & Hu, H. (2016). Letter to the editors: Transcending divisions and harmonizing interests: How the arctic council experience can inform regional cooperation on environmental protection in the South China Sea. Chinese Journal of International Law, 15(4), 935–945.
Bealey, F., & Johnson, A. G. (1999). The Blackwell dictionary of political science: User. Malden: Blackwell.
Chapman, B. (2016). China’s nine-dashed map: Continuing maritime source of geopolitical tension. Geopolitics, History, and International Relations, 8(1), 146-168.
Darajati, M. R., & Adolf, H. (2018). Putusan Sengketa Laut China Selatan Serta Implikasi Hukumnya Terhadap Negara Disekitar Kawasan Tersebut. Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 48(1), 22-43.
Gau, M. S. T. (2012). The U-shaped line and a categorization of the ocean disputes in the South China Sea. Ocean Development & International Law, 43(1), 57-69.
Hayton, B. (2019). The modern origins of China’s South China Sea claims: Maps, misunderstandings, and the maritime geobody. Modern China, 45(2), 127-170.
Junef, M. (2018). Sengketa Wilayah Maritim di Laut Tiongkok Selatan. Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure, 18(2), 219-240.
Krishnamohan, D. T. (2017). Asian-Pacific Region Shift to the Centre of Gravity in the Twenty-First Century. Imperial Journal of Interdisciplinary Research (IJIR), 3(5).
Laksmi, L. G. C. S., Mangku, D. G. S., & Yuliartini, N. P. R. (2022). Peran Indonesia dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Internasional di Laut Cina Selatan. Jurnal Komunitas Yustisia, 5(2), 225-242.
Mitchell, M. D. (2016). The South China Sea: A geopolitical analysis. Journal of Geography and Geology, 8(3), 14-25.
Mitra, D. (2016). Modi to Visit Vietnam as India’s Act East Policy Takes It to South China Sea.
Perez-Alvaro, E., & Forrest, C. (2018). Maritime archaeology and underwater cultural heritage in the disputed South China Sea. International Journal of Cultural Property, 25(3), 375-401.
Roza, R., Nainggolan, P. P., & Muhamad, S. V. (2013). Konflik Laut China Selatan dan implikasinya terhadap kawasan. P3DI Setjen DPR Republik Indonesia dan Azza Grafika.
Vujakovic, P. (2020). The map is the story: the U-shaped line in western news media coverage of the geopolitics of the South China Sea. International Journal of Cartography, 6(2), 179-201.
Yu, X., Chen, H., & Li, C. (2019). Evaluate typhoon disasters in 21st century maritime silk road by super-efficiency DEA. International journal of environmental research and public health, 16(9), 1614.
Yulianah, S. E. (2022). Metodelogi Penelitian Sosial. Jakarta: Rey Media Grafika
