Reformulating Product Liability for Autonomous Vehicles: A Comparative Analysis of Causation Theories in Indonesian and Kuwaiti Civil Law

Authors

  • Zein Samsia Ibrahim Faculty of Law, Universitas Negeri Gorontalo

Keywords:

Manufacturer liability; autonomous vehicles; causation theory; Indonesian civil law; Kuwaiti civil law

Abstract

The development of autonomous vehicles as a disruptive technological product presents serious challenges to civil law, particularly in determining manufacturer liability when accidents occur. The causation theory that underpins civil liability in Indonesia and Kuwait has not yet explicitly accommodated the complexity of artificial intelligence decisions, which are non-linear and multi-factorial. This research employs a normative legal method with a comparative law approach between the Indonesian Civil Code and the Kuwaiti Civil Code (Law No. 67 of 1980). The analysis reveals that Indonesian law, which alternately applies the conditio sine qua non theory and the proximate cause theory, fails to provide certainty and justice due to its binary approach. By contrast, Kuwaiti law adopts a gradation of causality through the distinction between al-sabab al-mubasyir (direct cause) and al-sabab al-mutasabib (indirect cause), and imposes strict liability for dangerous objects under Article 229. Based on this comparison, this study formulates a manufacturer liability reform through three pillars: tiered liability based on SAE automation levels, reversal of the burden of proving causality at high automation levels, and the establishment of mandatory insurance and a no-fault compensation fund. This reform requires amendments to the Indonesian Civil Code or the enactment of a special law on artificial intelligence and autonomous vehicles. In conclusion, Indonesia should adopt Kuwait's tiered approach to make manufacturer liability fairer, more adaptive, and legally certain in the era of technological disruption.

References

A. Ardiansyah dan S. Aminah, “Pertanggungjawaban Hukum Produsen Kendaraan Otonom Berdasarkan Prinsip Strict Liability di Indonesia,” Jurnal Hukum Ius Quia Iustum, vol. 31, no. 2, hlm. 289–310, 2024, doi: 10.20885/iustum.vol31.iss2.art5.

R. S. Bachro, “Product Liability sebagai Salah Satu Alternatif Perlindungan Terhadap Keamanan dan Keselamatan Konsumen,” Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan, vol. 35, no. 1, hlm. 45–62, 2005, doi: 10.21143/jhp.vol35.no1.1456.

K. Dewi, Z. Nizam, dan R. Rahman, “Liability in Autonomous Vehicle Accidents: Crafting New Legal Norms for a Driverless Future in Indonesia,” Rechtsnormen: Journal of Law, vol. 3, no. 5, hlm. 267–278, 2026, doi: 10.55984/rechtsnormen.v3i5.234.

N. Destyarini dan Pujiyono, “Tanggung Jawab Pidana Pengemudi Kendaraan Berteknologi Autopilot,” Jurnal Hukum dan Keadilan, vol. 10, no. 2, hlm. 145–162, 2020, doi: 10.30595/jhk.v10i2.7890.

S. Fakhriah dan S. Syamsul, “Analisis Yuridis Keabsahan Smart Contract dalam Perspektif Hukum Perdata Indonesia,” Jurnal Kepastian Hukum dan Keadilan, vol. 7, no. 1, hlm. 45–55, 2025, doi: 10.30872/jkhk.v7i1.1234.

M. Filippelli, “Competition Policy and the Oligopoly Problem: The Weakness of Cartel Rules against Tacit Collusion,” Concorenza e Mercato, hlm. 1–25, 2019, doi: 10.2139/ssrn.3353872.

Z. Ali, Metode penelitian hukum. Sinar Grafika, 2021.

M. A. Geistfeld, “A Roadmap for Autonomous Vehicles: State Tort Liability, Automobile Insurance, and Federal Safety Regulation,” California Law Review, vol. 105, no. 6, hlm. 1611–1694, 2017, doi: 10.15779/Z38B853H5K.

K. B. A. Herwanto dan R. E. Latumahina, “Bentuk Perlindungan Hukum bagi Konsumen Mobil Semi-Autonomous Terhadap Kecelakaan Akibat Gagalnya Sistem,” Bureaucracy Journal: Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance, vol. 3, no. 1, hlm. 613–617, 2023, doi: 10.53363/bureau.v3i1.245.

Y. Katsoulacos dan D. T. Ulph, “Legal Uncertainty, Competition Law Enforcement Procedures and Optimal Penalties,” European Journal of Law and Economics, vol. 40, hlm. 1–20, 2015, doi: 10.1007/s10657-015-9491-5.

W. E. Kovacic, R. C. Marshall, L. M. Marx, dan H. L. White, “Plus Factors and Agreement in Antitrust Law,” Michigan Law Review, vol. 110, no. 3, hlm. 393–436, 2011, doi: 10.2139/ssrn.1980164.

D. Liakopoulos, “Protection of Competition through the Principle of Legal Certainty – The Role of the Court of Justice of the European Union,” Meritum, vol. 13, no. 2, hlm. 1–33, 2019, doi: 10.46560/meritum.v13i2.6827.

R. Supriyatni, “Product Liability Sebagai Salah Satu Alternatif Perlindungan Terhadap Keamanan Dan Keselamatan Konsumen,” Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan, vol. 33, no. 1, hlm. 78–95, 2003, doi: 10.21143/jhp.vol33.no1.1234.

B. Long, Z. Zhao, dan Q. Cai, “Comparing Tort Liability Frameworks in Autonomous Vehicle Accident Governance,” World Electric Vehicle Journal, vol. 17, no. 1, hlm. 32, 2026, doi: 10.3390/wevj17010032.

O.-J. Luik dan R. Kinkar, “Artificial Intelligence and Non-Contractual Liability: Will the Insurance System Replace the Tort System in the Future? An Example of Autonomous Vehicles,” Juridica International, vol. 34, hlm. 71–89, Des 2025, doi: 10.12697/JI.2025.34.06.

M. Malik, “Legal Reconstruction for Autonomous Vehicle Use in Indonesia: Challenges and Solutions in the Age of Artificial Intelligence,” Diponegoro Law Review, vol. 10, no. 1, hlm. 45–68, 2025, doi: 10.14710/dilrev.10.1.2025.45-68.

G. Monti, “Presumptions and Burden of Proof in EU Competition Law: The Intel Judgment,” Journal of European Competition Law & Practice, vol. 10, no. 7, hlm. 448–456, 2019, doi: 10.1093/jeclap/lpz048.

D. A. Nugroho dan J. Hafidz, “Analysis of Legal Responsibility for Accidents Due to Malfunction of the Car Autopilot System According to Indonesian Criminal Law,” Jurnal Hukum UNISSULA, vol. 11, no. 1, hlm. 1–18, 2025, doi: 10.30659/jh.v11i1.4567.

M. Rosyad, S. F. M. Ali, dan D. Sukardi, “Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Konsumen Kendaraan Listrik dengan Fitur Kendali Otomatis,” Focus: Journal of Law, vol. 6, no. 1, hlm. 48–58, 2025, doi: 10.53697/focus.v6i1.1909.

A. I. Oilinda dan A. M. Rusdi, “Tanggung Jawab Pelaku Usaha Terhadap Risiko Kecacatan Produk Bagi Konsumen Mobil Listrik dengan Fitur Kendali Otomatis (Self-Driving) Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999,” Constitutum: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum, vol. 2, no. 2, hlm. 104–124, 2024, doi: 10.33830/constitutum.v2i2.6789.

A. M. Qistina, R. R. Erlangga, T. M. Jaudah, dan P. Sulistyaningsih, “A Civil Law Review of Liability in Accidents Involving Electric Vehicles with Autonomous Control Systems,” Unimma Press Law Journal, vol. 1, no. 1, hlm. 15–32, 2025, doi: 10.31000/upj.v1i1.2345.

O. Rachum-Twaig dan G. Perl, “Human Liability in Semi-Autonomous Vehicles,” Fordham Intellectual Property, Media & Entertainment Law Journal, vol. 35, no. 2, hlm. 444–501, 2025.

Downloads

Published

2026-07-08

How to Cite

Ibrahim, Z. S. (2026). Reformulating Product Liability for Autonomous Vehicles: A Comparative Analysis of Causation Theories in Indonesian and Kuwaiti Civil Law. Dalihan Na Tolu: Jurnal Hukum, Politik Dan Komunikasi Indonesia, 4(02), 165–173. Retrieved from https://jurnal.seaninstitute.or.id/index.php/Jhui/article/view/843