The Effect of Corporate Social Responsibility, Inventory Intensity, and Capital Intensity on Tax Aggressiveness

Wulandari Cahyani Putri; Lindawati Lindawati

Authors

Wulandari Cahyani Putri Faculty of Economics and Business, Pamulang University
Lindawati Lindawati Faculty of Economics and Business, Pamulang University

Keywords:

Corporate Social Responsibility, Inventory Intensity, Capital Intensity, Tax Aggressiveness

Abstract

This study is motivated by the phenomenon of corporate efforts to minimize tax burdens through tax planning and tax aggressiveness strategies. Companies tend to reduce their tax obligations through both legal mechanisms, such as tax avoidance, and illegal practices, such as tax evasion. In this context, firms are often evaluated based on their ability to exploit gaps in tax regulations to reduce payable taxes. Therefore, this study aims to analyze the effect of Corporate Social Responsibility, Inventory Intensity, and Capital Intensity on tax aggressiveness in energy sector manufacturing companies listed on the Indonesia Stock Exchange. This research adopts a quantitative approach using secondary data derived from annual financial reports. The sample consists of eighteen companies observed over a five-year period, resulting in ninety observations selected through purposive sampling. The data are analyzed using panel data regression with the assistance of EViews software. The analysis includes descriptive statistics, classical assumption tests, and hypothesis testing through t-test and F-test. The findings indicate that Corporate Social Responsibility, Inventory Intensity, and Capital Intensity simultaneously influence tax aggressiveness. Partially, Corporate Social Responsibility has a significant effect on tax aggressiveness, while Inventory Intensity and Capital Intensity do not show significant effects. These results suggest that non-financial factors play a more prominent role in shaping corporate tax behavior.

References

A. Shafira, Y. Guritno, and H. N. L. Ermaya, “Pengaruh Corporate Social Responsibility, Ukuran Perusahaan, Dan Leverage Terhadap Penghindaran Pajak Pada Perusahaan Manufaktur,” J. Akunida, vol. 8, no. 1, 2022.

D. P. Arda and Y. Yusuf, “The Moderating Role of Leverage in the Relationship Between Capital Intensity and Tax Avoidance,” J. Ilm. Multidisiplin Indones., vol. 4, no. 7, pp. 636–645, 2025.

J. Abidin, “Pengaruh Capital Intensity Dan Advertising In-Tensity Terhadap Agresivitas Pajak Dengan Firm Size Sebagai Variabel Moderasi,” Distrib. Manag. Bus., vol. 11, no. 2, pp. 197–206, 2023.

S. Rahayu and T. Suryarini, “The Effect of CSR Disclosure, Firm Size, Capital Intensity, and Inventory Intensity on Tax Aggressiveness,” Account. Anal. J., vol. 10, no. 3, pp. 191–197, 2021.

M. Mustika, V. Ratnawati, and A. Silfi, “Pengaruh Corporate Social Responsibility, Ukuran Perusahaan, Profitabilitas, Leverage, Capital Intensity dan Kepemilikan Keluarga terhadap Agresivitas Pajak (Studi Empiris pada Perusahaan Pertambangan dan Pertanian yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia P.” Riau University, 2017.

J. Nuraslam and A. Silfi, “Pengaruh Ukuran Perusahaan, Dewan Komisaris, Inventory Intensity, Capital Intensity, dan Leverage terhadap Tax Aggressiveness,” J. Tax. Tax Cent., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 50–73, 2022.

Q. N. Iffah and A. Amrizal, “Analisis Pengaruh Capital Intensity, Leverage, Profitabilitas, Ukuran Perusahaan, dan Perputaran Persediaan terhadap Agresivitas Pajak,” J. Akunt. dan Manaj., vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 74–82, 2022.

I. F. Yuliana and D. Wahyudi, “Likuiditas, profitabilitas, leverage, ukuran perusahaan, capital intensity dan inventory intensity terhadap agresivitas pajak (studi empiris pada perusahaan manufaktur yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia tahun 2013–2017),” Din. Akunt. Keuang. Dan Perbank., vol. 7, no. 2, 2018.

A. C. Michalos, “Tax Justice Network,” in Encyclopedia of Business and Professional Ethics, Springer, 2023, pp. 1744–1745.

S. L. Y. Prastyatini and M. Y. Trivita, “Pengaruh capital intensity, kepemilikan institusional dan ukuran perusahaan terhadap agresivitas pajak,” Al-Kharaj J. Ekon. Keuang. Bisnis Syariah, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 943–959, 2023.

F. Nugraha and R. Rusliansyah, “Pengaruh corporate social responsibility, intensitas modal dan intensitas persediaan terhadap agresivitas pajak,” J. Ilmu Akunt. Mulawarman, vol. 7, no. 1, p. 7, 2022.

Z. Hanum and J. Faradila, “Pengaruh Corporate Social Responsibility Terhadap Agresivitas Pajak Pada Perusahaan Makanan dan Minuman Yang Terdaftar Di BEI,” Own. Ris. Dan J. Akunt., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 479–487, 2023.

D. Wijaya, “Pengaruh pengungkapan corporate social responsibility, leverage, dan kepemilikan manajerial terhadap agresivitas pajak,” Widyakala J. J. Pembang. Jaya Univ., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 55–76, 2019.

S. D. Pinareswati and T. Mildawati, “Pengaruh pengungkapan CSR, capital intensity, leverage, profitabilitas, dan inventory intensity terhadap agresivitas pajak,” J. Ilmu dan Ris. Akunt., vol. 9, no. 9, 2020.

M. Rinaldi, N. W. Respati, and F. Fatimah, “Pengaruh Corporate Social Responsibility, Political Connection, Capital Intensity Dan Inventory Intensity Terhadap Tax Aggressiveness,” Simak, vol. 18, no. 02, pp. 149–171, 2020.

R. P. Anggraini and H. Agustina, “Pengaruh Inventory Intensity, Profitability, Liquidity Dan Capital Intensity Terhadap Agresitivitas Pajak,” J. Ilm. Raflesia Akunt., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 12–23, 2022.

H. W. Apriyanti and M. Arifin, “Tax aggressiveness determinants,” J. Islam. Account. Financ. Res., vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 24–52, 2021.

C. D. Anggriantari and A. H. Purwantini, “Pengaruh profitabilitas, capital intensity, inventory intensity, dan leverage pada penghindaran pajak,” in UMMagelang Conference Series, 2020, pp. 137–153.

R. Sinaga and H. Malau, “Pengaruh Capital Intensity dan Inventory Intensity Terhadap Penghindaran Pajak,” J. Ilm. Mhs. Manajemen, Bisnis Dan Akunt., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 311–322, 2021.

A. T. Hidayat and E. F. Fitria, “Pengaruh Capital Intensity, Inventory Intensity, Profitabilitas dan Leverage Terhadap Agresivitas Pajak,” Eksis J. Ris. Ekon. Dan Bisnis, vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 157–168, 2018.

A. Y. Nurdiana, E. M. Wahyuningsih, and R. N. Fajri, “Dimensi Agresivitas Pajak Dilihat Dari Firm Size, Likuditas, Profitabilitas Dan Inventory Intensity,” Jae (Jurnal Akunt. Dan Ekon., vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 74–83, 2020.

E. Fernández-Rodríguez and A. Martínez-Arias, “Do business characteristics determine an effective tax rate? Evidence for listed companies in China and the United States,” Chinese Econ., vol. 45, no. 6, pp. 60–83, 2012.

I. N. H. Darmadi and Z. Zulaikha, “Analisis Faktor yang Mempengaruhi Manajemen Pajak dengan Indikator Tarif Pajak Efektif (Studi Empiris pada Perusahaan Manufaktur yang Terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia pada Tahun 2011-2012).” Fakultas Ekonomika dan Bisnis, 2013.

S. Ayem and A. Setyadi, “Pengaruh Profitabilitas, Ukuran Perusahaan, Komite Audit Dan Capital IntensityTerhadap Agresivitas Pajak (Studi Pada Perusahaan Perbankan Yang Terdaftar di BEI Periode Tahun 2013-2017),” J. Akunt. Pajak Dewantara, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 228–241, 2019.

M. R. Sari and I. G. A. Indrawan, “Pengaruh kepemilikan instutional, capital intensity dan inventory intensity terhadap Tax Avoidance,” Own. Ris. Dan J. Akunt., vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 4037–4049, 2022.

H. Aini and A. Kartika, “The Pengaruh Profitabilitas, Leverage, Komisaris Independen, Ukuran Perusahaan dan Capital Intensity Terhadap Penghindaran Pajak,” Kompak J. Ilm. Komputerisasi Akunt., vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 61–73, 2022.

A. Yahya, E. G. Agustin, and P. Nurastuti, “Firm Size, Capital Intensity dan Inventory Intensity terhadap Agresivitas Pajak,” J. Eksplor. Akunt., vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 574–588, 2022.

S. Sugiyono, “Metode penelitian kuantitatif dan kualitatif dan R&D,” Alf. Bandung, 2018.

S. Sugiyono, “Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif Kuantitatif dan R&D,” Bandung. Cv. Alf., 2019.