Dissecting The Case Of Karen Agustiawan (Former President Director Of Pt. Pertamina) Through Analysis Of The Teaching Of Causality
Keywords:
A State-Owned Enterprise, State Financial Losses, Corruption CrimeAbstract
A State-Owned Enterprise is a form of company whose capital is partly or wholly owned by the state. Therefore, when it makes a loss, law enforcement officials immediately qualify it as a criminal act of corruption. This cannot be separated from the conflict of legal norms related to the regulations governing it. Basically, it’s directors have a scope of duties to run and develop their business, which is inseparable from the possibility of losses. The aim of this research is to dissect the case of Karen Agustiawan through the teaching of causality, so that we will be able to see the facts that are factors that contribute to causing state financial losses, as well as see whether or not the burden of criminal responsibility can be assigned to the directors. This research was conducted using normative juridical research methods and a case approach. The conclusion of this research is that the teaching of causality can be applied to analyze corruption offenses, so that we can see a series of facts that constitute acts against the law as well as the intention of the perpetrators and contribute to the emergence of state financial losses. In the case of Karen Agustiawan, another factor that must be considered is the formal factor in the form of the application of the principles of Business Judgment Rules which can be an element of forgiveness that cannot be held criminally liable to the Board of Directors.
References
Effendi Erdianto. (2022). Problematika Pembuktian Unsur Memperkaya Diri Sendiri dan Menguntungkan Diri Sendiri atau Orang Lain atau Suatu Korporasi Dalam Tindak Pidana Korupsi. Bandung: PT. Refika Aditama.
Fitriani Dhaifina. (2020). Perlindungan direksi Melalui Business Judgment Rule (Studi Analisis Kasus Karen Agustiawan Mantan Dirut Pertamina). Al-Muamalat: Jurnal Hukum & Ekonomi Syariah, 5(2), 104.
Hamzah Andi. (2017). Hukum Pidana Indonesia. Jakarta Timur: Sinar Grafika
Ibrahim Johnny. (2005). Teori dan Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Normatif. Malang: Bayumedia.
Januarsyah, et al. (2022). Penerapan Doktrin Business Judgment Rule Dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi Karen Agustiawan. Jurnal Ius Constituendum, 7(1), 145.
Mardatillah Aida. (2022). Mengenal Judex Factie dan Judex Jurist dalam Praktek Peradilan. [Internet]: https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/mengenal-judex-factie-dan-judex-jurist- dalam-praktik-peradilan-lt61f193261cc1a/, diakses pada 10 November 2023.
Sofian Ahmad. (2018). Ajaran Kausalitas Hukum Pidana Edisi Kedua. Jakarta: Kencana.
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 19 Tahun 2003 Tentang Badan Usaha Milik Negara.
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 20 Tahun 2001 Tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 1999 Tentang Pemberantasan Tindak Pidana Korupsi.
Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 40 Tahun 2007 tentang Perseroan Terbata
