Modern Architecture: Reading Signs and Symbols in a Technological Environment
Keywords:
Architecture, Signs and Symbols, TechnologyAbstract
In an era where technology continues to develop rapidly, modern architects are faced with the challenge of creating buildings that are not only aesthetically pleasing, but also able to communicate with their occupants through an effective visual language. This research aims to explore an in-depth understanding of how modern architecture interacts with the technological environment through the use of signs and symbols. This research method involves literature analysis to investigate the role of signs and symbols in modern architecture using a qualitative approach. The research results show that the use of signs and symbols in modern architecture, especially in the context of a technological environment, has a significant impact. Signs and symbols not only function as visual communication tools, but also as aesthetic elements that can increase the artistic value of a building. Through intelligent integration, symbols form a visual identity, create a sense of connection with technological advancements, and provide an immersive, holistic experience for residents. The implication is that the wise use of signs and symbols can guide architectural designers in creating buildings that not only combine aesthetics and technology, but also provide deeper meaning and value for the people who inhabit the building.
References
Arvian, N., & Subekti, B. (2021). Penerapan Konsep Arsitektur Modern dalam Rancangan Mall di Kota Baru Parahyangan. FAD, 1(1).
Arwas, V. (1996). The Art of Glass: Art Nouveau to Art Deco. Papadakis Publisher.
Becker, G. F. (1997). Art nouveau. Konemann.
Cahyani, M., & Sari, Y. (2020). Kajian Arsitektur Modern Pada Bangunan Pusat Mode. In Seminar Nasional Komunitas dan Kota Berkelanjutan (Vol. 2, No. 1, pp. 124-130).
Dharma, A. (2012). Unsur Komunikasi dalam Arsitektur Post-Modern. Fakultas Teknik dan Perencanaan. Universitas Gunadarma.
Erdiono, D. (2012). Arsitektur ‘Modern’(Neo) Vernakular di Indonesia. Sabua: Jurnal Lingkungan Binaan dan Arsitektur, 3(3).
Fadilasari, D. (2019). Analisis Penerapan Art Deco Pada Rumah di Bandung Periode Perang Dunia I-II Studi Kasus: Tiga Villa dan Perumahan Dosen UPI. Jurnal Arsitektur, 9(2), 1-6.
Gartiwa, M. (2006). Polarisasi Arsitektur Modern dan Post Modern.
Gunawan, D. E. K., & Prijadi, R. (2011). Reaktualisasi Ragam Art Deco Dalam Arsitektur Kontemporer. Media matrasain, 8(1).
Hatta, A. J., Hasriyanti, N., Rahmayanti, R., Rahmansah, R., Syafriyani, S., Fitriani, D., ... & Saputra, W. (2023). METODOLOGI DAN FAKTOR PENTING DALAM PERANCANGAN ARSITEKTUR. Get Press Indonesia.
Lake, R. C., Purbadi, Y. D., Rayawulan, R. M., Daton, R., & Lalu, E. D. (2019). Simbol Dan Ornamen-Simbolis Pada Arsitektur Gereja Katolik Regina Caeli Di Perumahan Pantai Indah Kapuk-Jakarta. Jurnal IDEALOG: Ide dan Dialog Indonesia, 4(1), 23-39.
Laurens, J. M. (2003). Imaji dan Peran Media Desain Dalam Proses Desain Arsitektur. DIMENSI (Journal of Architecture and Built Environment), 31(1).
Mudeng, J., & Siswanto, W. (2012). Penerapan Prinsip Prinsip Seni Ekspresionisme Dalam Rancangan Arsitektur. Jurnal Arsitektur DASENG, 1(1), 30-36.
Muktiono, A. (2021). Information Message Of Kindness On The Architecture Gate Of The Palace Solo. International Journal of Science, Technology & Management, 2(4), 1280-1291.
Muktiono, A., & Mahfud, B. (2022). KAJIAN ESTETIKA PADA FASAD BANGUNAN STASIUN:(Studi Kasus: Stasiun Bogor). Jurnal Ilmiah ARJOUNA, 7(1), 61-69.
Pawitro, U. (2010). Fenomena Post-Modernisme dalam Arsitektur Abad ke-21. Jurnal Itenas Rekayasa, 14(1).
Rasikha, T. (2009). Arsitektur organik kontemporer. Depok: Universitas Indonesia.
Striner, R. (1990). Art Deco: Polemics and Synthesis. Winterthur Portfolio, 25(1), 21-34
Sugiyono, P. (2011). Metodologi penelitian kuantitatif kualitatif dan R&D. Alpabeta, Bandung, 62-70.
Wicaksono, M. R. T. T. (2020). Kajian Arsitektur Modern Pada Prasarana Sekolah Keberbakatan Olahraga (SKO). Jurnal Arsitektur Zonasi, 3(2), 252-260.
