The Effect of Price, Promotion and Product Quality on the Decision to Repurchase Liquid Fertilizer

Authors

  • Imma Nurhayati Postgraduate Study Program in Management, Lamongan Islamic University, Lamongan, Indonesia
  • Mohammad Yaskun Postgraduate Study Program in Management, Lamongan Islamic University, Lamongan, Indonesia
  • Evi Fitrotun Najiah Postgraduate Study Program in Management, Lamongan Islamic University, Lamongan, Indonesia

Keywords:

Price, Promotion, Product Quality, Repurchase Decision

Abstract

This study aims to determine the effect of price, promotion, and product quality on the decision to repurchase liquid fertilizer. UD Primatan Mikro either partially, simultaneously and is the most dominant factor among the three variables above that influence repurchase decisions. This type of research is quantitative with a sample of 57 people. The sampling technique is Validity Test, Reliability Test, Classical Assumption Test, Multiple Correlation Analysis, Multiple Linear Regression Analysis, Coefficientof Determination Analysis, t Test, F Test. The results of this test result that the variables of Price, Promotion and Product quality partially influence the Buyer's Decision UD Primatan Mikro. The results show that the price (X1) = 3.012 < t table 2005, promotion (X2) = 2.466 < t table 2005, product quality (X3) = 2.605 < t table 2005. then H0 is rejected and Ha is accepted. F test evidence obtained Fcount = 28,817 > Ftable = 3.17 means that the independent variable simultaneously affects the dependent variable. 3. The results of calculations using Multiple Linear Regression Test obtained that the most dominant is Promotion (X1) with a regression coefficient value of 0.363 and a standard beta coefficient of 0.359, compared to the Product Quality variable (X3), the standard regression coefficient of 0.261 and the standard beta coefficient of 0.283 and price variable (X2) the standard regression coefficient is 0.358 and the standard beta coefficient is 0.323.7. The results of the hypothesis test show . Price, Promotion, and Product Quality have a significant positive positive impact in t table 2005 so that t count 3,014 > t table 2,005 and a significant value 0.004 < 0.05 then H0 is rejected and Ha is accepted, meaning that there is a partially significant effect between the price variables. (X1) against the buyer's decision (Y) UD. Primatan Mikro.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Assauri, Sofjan. (2011). Marketing Management.11th Edition. Publisher PT. Raja Grafindo Persada Jakarta.

Arafatu, Winda. (2017). Analysis of the Impact of Price and Brand Image on the Decision to Repurchase Hijab at Rabbanicollection Outlet in Bojonegoro. Commerce Study Program, Faculty of Economics.State University of Surabaya

Bairizky, Ahmad. (2017). The Influence of Price, Promotion and Product Quality on Purchase Decisions in Increasing Sales (Case Study on UD. Ratna Cake and Cookies). AMM Mataram College of Economics.

Bailia, J.F., Soegoto, A.S., & Landong, S.S. (2014). The Influence of Product Quality, Price and Location on Consumer Decisions at Lamongan Food Stalls in Manado. Emba Journal ISSN 2303-1174, Volume 2 No.3. 1768-1780.

Christy Jacklin & Sepang Jantje & Loindong Sjendry, (2017).The Influence of Product Quality, Price and Promotion on the Decision to Buy a NISSAN X-TRAIL car at PT. Wahana Wiaman Manado. Faculty of Economics and Business, Department of Management, Sam Ratulangi University, Manado.

Donni Juni Priansa, Spd.SE.MM.,Q.(2017). Integrated Communication-Integrated (in the social era.) Bandung.CV.Pustaka Setia.

Efendi Zulham, Mahmudah Enny & Nurul Imamah. (2017). The Influence of Promotion, Brand Image, and Consumer Satisfaction on Repeat Purchases of Elzatta Products in Surabaya.

Firman & Sirajudin Putri Dwi, (2015). The Effect of Product Quality and Brand Association on Consumer Repurchase Decisions of Biore Body Foam in Padang State University Students. Management of Padang State University.

Ghozali, Imam. 2012. Application of Multivariate Analysis with IBM SPSS Program. Yogyakarta: Diponegoro University.

Hawkins, et al,. (2007). Consumer Behavior, Building Marketing Strategy 10th Edition. New York: The McGraw-Hiil Companies, Inc.

Kotler and Amstrong.2008.Marketing Management. Volume 1. Publisher Erlangga.Jakarta.

Kotler,Philip&Kevin Lanekeller. (2016).Marketing Management. 15th Edition, Pearson Education.

Peter, J. P., & Olson, J. C. (2013). Consumer Behavior & Marketing Strategy. Jakarta: Salemba Four.

Sugiyono. (2014). Quantitative, Qualitative Research Methods and R&D. Alfabeta Bandung.

Sugiyono. (2017). Quantitative, Qualitative and R&D Research Methods. Bandung : Alfabeta,CV.

Scott, Fandy. (2008). Elements of Marketing Strategy. Andi Yogyakarta Publisher.

Zeithaml, V.A, M.J. Bitner and D.D Gremler, 2013. Service Marketing Integrating Customer Focus Across the Firm, 6th ed, McGraw-Hill Irwin,Boston.

Downloads

Published

2024-06-19

How to Cite

Imma Nurhayati, Mohammad Yaskun, & Evi Fitrotun Najiah. (2024). The Effect of Price, Promotion and Product Quality on the Decision to Repurchase Liquid Fertilizer . Jurnal Ekonomi, Akuntasi Dan Manajemen Indonesia (JEAMI), 2(02), 157–162. Retrieved from https://jurnal.seaninstitute.or.id/index.php/Juemi/article/view/1001

Most read articles by the same author(s)